NCSE is an initiative
of the Partnership
for Families & Children.
www.pffac.org
|
|
| |
 |
Transitions to and from Elementary, Middle, and High School
The Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA asked several of the school districts they work with what they had in place to assist students as they moved from one level of schooling to the next. This is how the districts replied. Some great ideas for transition programs and activities are included in this document. Click here to read the document in PDF format.
The Alliance for Excellent Education
The Alliance for Excellent Education has published a new study online entitled Education and the Economy: Boosting State and National Economies by Improving High School Graduation Rates. The webpage includes full color poster-format PDF's ideal for posting in your school. One is a one-page pictoral flow-chart showing all the ways in which an increase in graduates would boost the national economy. There is a seperate two-page PDF for each state. To go to the Alliance website and to this document click here.
Raised By The Courts A Book Review by Joanna Zorn Heilbrunn The National Center for School Engagement
Full of edge-of-your-seat suspense, all the more gripping in its painful truth, Raised by the Courts by Judge Irene Sullivan reads like fiction. Indeed, to those who are unfamiliar with the plight of abused, neglected and (later) delinquent youth, one might think that, surely, this has to be fiction. Yet, sadly, it is not.
Sullivan portrays with candor and compassion the stories of the children who have come before her throughout her nine years as a juvenile court judge in Pinellas County, Florida. Without drama, she lays out some of the tough choices she has made in her effort to balance public safety with the well-being of often fatherless children who have had little solid parenting, interrupted schooling, inadequate housing, and who may also have learning disabilities or mental health concerns. She tells the story of little boys who were brought to court for sneaking out of their grandmother’s house to go swimming after dark. By the end of the book we understand they are well on their way to rejecting the guidance and discipline that youngsters need to keep them safe and make them productive. One fears Judge Sullivan will see these boys again.
She describes her distress at unwittingly sentencing several girls to a high-risk facility at which they were never permitted to go outside, where chaos ruled and untrained guards too often used physical force, and where the mostly male staff routinely watched the teen-aged girls shower and use the toilet; there were no doors on the stalls. After making an unannounced visit, she closed the place down.
The chapter on child abuse documents “the transition of abused, neglected infants and toddlers into angry, delinquent kids.” (p. 25.) Chapters on disproportionate minority contact illustrate how “the sea of black faces” (p. 83) ends up in court, coming from a neighborhood in which single working mothers cannot supervise their children, and gangs take over the job. Sullivan writes, “ Just last week in court, I faced fifteen black boys, half of whom were in custody, the others with family or relatives. Two girls appeared on minor matters. None of the children was white. I’ve been called a racist for incarcerating so many black youth, and ‘Judge Hug-A-Thug’ for failing to incarcerate black youths.” (p. 236.)
A chapter on mental health problems tells the story of Rachel, a 17-year-old who Judge Sullivan finally managed to get into a residential treatment program rather than juvenile detention. Sullivan quotes several letters from young people, the one from Rachel saying, “Dear Judges Sellven. I think I finded the nice Rachel. The one that do not hit people. The one never cuse. The good one that I miss so much.” (p. 49.) Some letters are so difficult to read that Sullivan must “translate” them into standard English. Others are just as disconcerting in their unexpected eloquence, like the one that came from a teen-aged murderer who was bounced around a series of foster homes, some abusive, and went in and out of juvenile detention, who replied thus to a letter from Judge Sullivan. “Your letter came at a good time and was well received.” He went on, “I now have the goal of trying to use my past, my knowledge of foster care and the juvenile justice system, to help others, maybe prevent kids from going through some of the things I went through. I even began dreaming of having certain foster homes shut down. I say all this not because I feel sorry for myself or want a pity party thrown. Instead I want to draw attention to the flaws in our system.” (p. 22).
Far from being all gloom and doom, Raised by the Courts highlights many programs that are working well to keep kids out of court in the first place, and keep them from reoffending once they make a first court appearance. Sullivan describes youth courts that give minor offenders the opportunity to appear before a jury of peers for sentencing, rather than a judge, and the responsibility of serving on the court themselves after they have successfully completed the terms of their sentence. Girl Matters programming empowers girls to keep them from running away and having to turn to prostitution to get by. The Annie E. Casey Foundation’s Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative (JDAI), has been replicated successfully in many communities, and works to keep kids out of court. A program for “cross-over kids,” meaning kids who have both open dependency cases and open delinquency cases, gives these kids the same lawyer in both courts. Sullivan cites three successful family therapy programs that are essential because “if you heal a child who must continue to remain in a distressed family, you’ve only put a Band-Aid on a mortal wound. In other words, you can’t build strong children without repairing the broken adults in their family.” (p. 171.) And appendices list a host of effective programs and on-line resources for practitioners working with troubled children.
Raised by the Courts is a must-read for anyone supporting children as they pass through the juvenile legal system. Judges, juvenile defense lawyers and social workers alike will find that the book stimulates critical reflection and is a fount of information on programs that are more effective than our failed, traditional practice of locking youngsters up, criminalizing them, interrupting their schooling and sealing the deal for adult prison. Indeed, this book is well-suited to be part of college curricula and were it read widely enough, it might help discredit the tough-on-crime policies that have stuck frightened taxpayers with extraordinary bills for prison systems when the cheaper prevention and early intervention programs cited by Judge Sullivan would have had better results. Kudos to Judge Sullivan!
Published by Kaplan Publishing in November 2010, Raised by the Courts may be ordered through Sullivan’s website at http://raisedbythecourts.org/.
The
National
Center for School Engagement is proud to launch our new on-line course entitled:
Truancy and Dropout: Mending the Cracks in the Graduation Pipeline
This course was developed in response to the many requests we receive for information on best practices in improving attendance and promoting school engagement. The course covers:
· Why school attendance matters so much · AAA Schools: the NCSE approach · Causes of truancy · Patterns of absence · Helpful approaches · Tips for effective case management · Compulsory school attendance law · Evaluation
Print this flyer for more information, or follow this link to register.
(Thanks to start-up support from the NJ Office of the Attorney General, the course is free to
New Jersey residents and employees.)
Five Myths About School Attendance Hedy Chang writes in Education Week about how useful school attendance data can be - if schools know what to look for, and take time to analyze the data. Click HERE to go to the article.
Transforming the High School Experience A rigorous study by MDRC finds that the New York City "Small School of Choice" initiative increased the four-year high school graduation rate of participating students by 6.8% on average. The small high schools included in the study serve a primarily disadvantaged group of students and does so on a large scale. Signifiant resources, both public and private, were invested in in this initiative, but if improvement can be made in the largest school district in the country, it can be made anywhere. To view the complete report in PDF format click HERE.
Student Characteristics and Achievement in 22 Kipp Middle Schools A new study of 22 KIPP middle schools finds that students make stunning gains in both reading and math by the end of 8th grade, Researchers at Mathematica Policy Institute show that the Knowledge is Power Program schools enrolled students who were mostly below average compared to those in the school districts of origin. Four years later, those same students earned state test scores that were substantially higher than the average scores from those same districts. For almost all the KIPP schools the differences were statistically significant and educationally sibstantial. To read the complete report in PDF format click HERE.
Student Engagement in School Shown to Mitigate Student Victimization Bullying and victimization of students in schools have received a great deal of deserved attention. NCSE undertook this study to investigate the nature of the relationship between bullying and truancy and delinquency. The study found that the power of victimization to distance students from learning can be overcome by schools adopting intentional student engagment strategies to create positive learning environments that, in turn, produce academic achievement. A brief treatment of the study's conclusions and recommendations can be found in the Executive Summary.
The full report provides great detail on how these recommendations and conclusions were reached. The literature review is timely and extensive to help program designers and researchers alike. The quantitative study using Structural Equation Modeling provides evidence among the key factors that point to the power of engagement for victims of bullying, and the lack of causative relationships between bullying and truancy. The qualitative studies look at different perspectives on the problem to help explain some of the "whys" behind the quatitaive data and the findings reported in the literature.
Report on Johns Hopkins Research Released The Colorado Graduates Initiative (CGI), a partnership between the
National
Center for School Engagement, Colorado Youth For A Change and the Colorado Children’s Campaign, has released a new study examining high school dropout rates in five
Colorado school districts. The study, “Advancing the Colorado Graduates Agenda: Understanding the Dropout Problem and Mobilizing to Meet the Graduation Challenge,” was conducted by researchers at
Johns
Hopkins
University and underscores the importance of preventing course failures, particularly in middle school and ninth grade.
The five participating districts were asked to take part in the study because they are among the largest districts in
Colorado and collectively have the highest raw numbers of dropouts. In particular the study finds that 25 percent of schools (108 in
Colorado ) account for 70 percent of all dropouts statewide.
The report highlights the importance of using behavioral, rather than demographic, information to identify and intervene with students who are at risk of dropping out. It was modeled after research done in other major cities, which has found that early warning signals such as absenteeism, poor behavior and poor course grades can identify potential dropouts early and guide effective response at the school district and school building level.
The report underscores the critical nature of passing core courses in the ninth grade and reveals the daunting challenges that students face when they fail early in their high school careers. Critical findings among the 2006-07 dropouts in the five districts include:
· More than three in four had failed one or more semester courses in ninth grade (compared to between one-fifth and one-third of graduates with the same indicator)
· A large majority (in four of the five districts) displayed patterns of chronic absenteeism
· Nearly half (in four of the five districts) had been suspended at least once during the previous four years (compared to about half as many among graduates)
These data make a compelling case for targeted district and school-building level response to student patterns of behavior that can be seen as early as 6th grade. Implementing an early warning system (EWS), developing a coordinated and comprehensive support system for students identified by the EWS, establishing a dropout recovery and retrieval program and assessing school building policies and practices are critical steps NCSE urges school districts to undertake.
Go to the full report here.
Additional John Hopkins Compendium Reports:
School Dropouts in Rural Colorado School Districts A study of rural school dropout rates in Colorado.
A Report on Gender and the Dropout Problem in Colorado Schools A report on research concerning the differences in school dropout rates based on gender in Colorado schools.
The Children We Left Behind are Dropping Out of School: Making the Case for Using Title I Federal Stimulus Funds for Dropout Prevention and Recovery By Dr. Ken Seeley
A recent study by
University of
Chicago Nobel economist James J. Heckman emphasizes the need to sustain early investments in at-risk children through their teenage years. He reported that with additional “skill building” strategies such as mentoring, adolescent literacy, and meaningful service learning; boys from high risk families were much less likely to become delinquent than boys who did not receive these interventions. He found that when the investments “were sustained into the teen age years,” 90 percent of the boys finished high school and 40 percent went on to attend college. (Heckman and Cunha, 2007) In a subsequent publication, Heckman went on to say, “to put these numbers in perspective, sustained skill-building investments would go a long way toward shrinking and in some cases eliminating, the nation’s worrisome racial disparities in academic achievement, drug use and college attendance.” (Heckman, 2007).
Heckman’s findings help explain a common criticism of early intervention with young children that the gains tend to fade over time. His work speaks to the efficacy of continuing to invest in at risk children well into their teen age years to ensure better outcomes. This helps to make the case for providing supplemental education services for at risk youth many of whom qualify for Title I services. Many of these services could prevent students from dropping out of school.
Recent studies by Johns Hopkins University researchers of dropouts in five of Colorado’s largest school districts clearly indicate that there are visible early warning signs of which students will dropout as early as sixth grade but most predictable at ninth grade. These signs include poor attendance, being suspended from school and/or failing grades even in just one course. (Balfanz, R and MacIver, M.; 2009)
Most federal education Title I funds are used by local school districts at elementary and some middle schools for qualifying low income children. The nature of these services varies by local priority but generally focus on academic remediation and supplemental education services. Title I services are typically not used for dropout prevention nor for older students in middle schools or high schools. With the new funding opportunities provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), local school districts now have new resources that can be used for at risk low income students who are identifiable as potential dropouts. As defined in law, Title I resources are to be used to fund strategies that enable all students to meet proficient and advanced levels of academic achievement. The law prescribes effective methods to: 1) strengthen the core academic program of the school; 2) increase the amount and quality of learning time, and 3) include interventions to meet educational needs of historically underserved populations. Additionally, many schools in poor communities are also failing, making students eligible for Supplemental Education Services (SES). These funds can be used to support the types of youth programming needed to ensure both academic success and healthy development. Acceptable uses of Title I funds include: · Extended school year · Before and after school programs · Summer programs · Counseling · Pupil services · Mentoring services · College and career awareness and preparation · Personal finance education Use of innovative teaching methods such as applied learning and team teaching strategies · Integration of vocational and technical education programs
(No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, PL 107-110, Jan.8, 2002. Title I, Part a, Sec 114 and 115)
As a state example,
Colorado will receive over $110 million for Title I stimulus funds in addition to the existing Title I funds which will receive an increase. Spending these funds to prevent or retrieve dropouts is a great way to invest these stimulus funds that are only in place for 2 years because the increased enrollment will generate new state per pupil operating revenue. Each year 18,000 students drop out. If we could cut the rate in half, we would increase local district state aid by $58,500,000 (at $6500 per pupil). This new revenue can be used to sustain the programs we create with the two-year stimulus funds.
The advantage of these funds as potential dropout prevention and intervention dollars is that they are new and additional so there is not the competition for existing Title I resources. The majority of students who are at risk for dropping out are eligible for Title I funds and indeed many participated in Title I programs in their younger years. Obviously, there will be many demands on these new funds so we need to get dropouts into the discussion immediately to get any serious consideration.
It is urgent that advocates for expanding opportunities for dropouts take immediate action to contact their school district leadership and make requests of these new funds for new programs to prevent school dropouts.
START THE DISCUSSION NOW! IF ANY STUDENTS ARE BEING LEFT BEHIND IT IS CLEARLY THOSE WHO DO NOT GRADUATE FROM HIGH SCHOOL.
|
|