 |
|
|
|
April 2009
Letter from the Editor
The GAO has put out a new study, Access to Arts Education, analyzing elementary school instructional time dedicated to the arts between 2004-2005 and 2006-2007. From a school engagement perspective, the good news is that only 7% of teachers reported a decrease in arts education time, while 5% reported an increase. The bad news is that reductions were both more likely and greater in schools designated as “in need of improvement” under NCLB, and schools that serve higher proportions of low-income students. Also of concern is the fact that this study does not measure changes in arts education in middle schools, a time when much (too much?) of the “fun stuff” of elementary school tends to drop away and kids must often make a big adjustment to an increase in academic rigor. Not too long ago I visited a middle school that had made significant gains in its test scores. And I learned they had done so in part by canceling all visual arts education and offering it as an afterschool activity only. Part of the trouble with moving arts education off the required list of subjects is that it sends the message that art is less important, and therefore success in art is also less important. Yet often, kids who have learning disabilities that make reading or math really difficult find a way to maintain their sense of self-esteem by succeeding in visual arts, music or theater. Kids need to be offered the most varied opportunities possible, because if the feeling of success dies, sooner or later effort dies as well.
On a much different note, please note that our next session of How to Evaluate Your Truancy Reduction Program will be held on May 28-29. Registration may be accessed via the link in the Conference section below.
Jodi Heilbrunn,
Newsletter Editor
Invitation for Letters to the Editor
Do you have feedback regarding our feature article or strategy of the month? Would you like to submit a feature article on a topic of your choice? Send your commentary or ideas to info@schoolengagement.org for possible publication in our next issue. Please make the subject of your message “Newsletter commentary.” I would love to hear from you!
Return to the Index of this Issue
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PACTT Alliance: Pennsylvania Academic and Career/Technical
Training Alliance
By
Candace Putter, Director, PACTT Alliance, and
Autumn Dickman, Project Manager,
Models for Change
As part of the Models for Change Initiative sponsored by the MacArthur Foundation, and linked below in the Resources section, the Pennsylvania Council of Chief Juvenile Probation Officers has developed the PACTT Alliance in order to strengthen the education which students receive in delinquent placement, thereby easing the transition back into school. Developing residential education programs in Pennsylvania poses special challenges due to the state’s local control model of education, resulting in 501 different school districts, each with its own graduation requirements. Residential programs must be designed to mesh with high school curriculum requirements of not just one or two school districts, but ten or twenty. The challenge is enormous, and solving it requires extensive collaboration and planning; it requires a PACTT!
Scope of the Problem
Delinquent youth returning from residential placements face immense challenges during the transition back to their community. The majority of these youth do not complete high school, making sustainable employment all the more difficult in today’s economy. A recent study (Cohen, 2007) found that that the present monetary value to the public of saving a high-risk youth is estimated to range from $2.6 to $4.4 million, over the young person’s lifetime. For delinquent youth, the process of preparation to complete school and be job-ready must begin while they are in placement, and continue seamlessly when they return to the community.
Project Description
The Pennsylvania Academic and Career/Technical Training Alliance(PACTT), capitalizing on the combined influence of Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties, strives to improve the academic and career and technical training that delinquent youth receive while in residential placement, and in their home communities upon return. The project’s initial focus is on the residential facilities and transition programs used by Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties, but then it will expand into other counties in the Commonwealth. In addition, the project will address and work to adapt juvenile-serving agencies’ policies and procedures that can hinder delinquent youth transitions back into school and the community. The project has received initial funding from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, and the Stoneleigh Center (through a fellowship to the Alliance director).
Project Goals
• Residential academic programs align with state standards and local graduation requirements.
• Residential facilities provide quality career/technical training that integrates academic goals, and leads to industry-recognized certification in priority occupations
• Home schools accept the facility-earned credits and facilitate the re-entry of the youth
• Public schools and communities develop programs that build upon achievements made during placement
• State regulatory agencies (e.g. Pa Department of Education and Department of Public Welfare) adapt their policies and procedures to encourage the reforms statewide
Project Implementation
• Project includes three senior staff and an administrative assistant
• Two Education and Career/Technical Training Specialists work to advance reforms in education and career/technical training in delinquent residential facilities, improve communication with home schools and school re-entry programs and expand options for the continuation of training in the schools and the community after discharge
• The Project Director is responsible for developing the linkage between the juvenile justice, child welfare, education, and career/technical training in order to support the work of the project and promote its goals throughout the state and country
More information about the PACTT Alliance may be found in a presentation entitled Academic and Career/Technical Training for Placed Youth by Candace Putter, and a news brief entitled “New project strives to break cycle of youth crime in Pennsylvania.”
Return to the Index of this Issue
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the editor's travels in Italy during April, there will be no strategy spotlight for this month's edition.
Return to the Index of this Issue
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check out the Education World Grant Center, there are fifteen grant categories you have time to apply for in the 2008-2009 school year.
The School Funding Center has a free newsletter that includes a limited number of grant announcements and grant writing tips. It also advertises a huge database of grants to which you may subscribe for various periods of time for different rates ranging from $99 for two months to $397 for a year. Grants are available for schools and non-profits
Sign up for education-related e-mail alerts from Grantsalert.com. The website also includes grant-seeking tips, a special page for sources of classroom funding for teachers (called GSFT), and a directory of grant writers to help you. Registering for funding alerts is free, but the grant writers, of course, are not.
Teachers, go to Donors Choose to make requests for classroom supplies.
Find and apply online for competitive grant opportunities from all Federal grant-making agencies.
RGK Foundation - The Foundation's programmatic areas of interest include Health, Education, Human Services, and Community Affairs. The Foundation's primary interests within education include formal K-12 education, literacy, and higher education.
The Dollar General offers annual or bi-annual grants in five literacy areas:
· Adult Literacy Grants
· Back-To-School Grants
· Beyond Words: The Dollar General School Library Relief Program
· Family Literacy Grants
· Youth Literacy Initiatives
Here’s a great webpage that lists endless grant opportunities for K-12 schools, and has a page on grant writing tips! They also offer a subscription to Schoolgrants Biweekly Newsletter for $45 a year.
Return to the Index of this Issue
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balfanz, R. and T. West, (2009) Progress Toward Increasing National and State Graduation Rates, Everyone Graduates Center, the Center for Social Organization of Schools, John Hopkins University.
This is the first in a series of data briefs to come out of the Everyone Graduates Center (at Johns Hopkins University. The authors define high schools with weak promoting power as those that graduate fewer than 60% of their students; high schools with high promoting power graduate over 90% of their students. Their report shows that nationwide there were 184 fewer schools with weak promoting power and 2,008 more schools with high promoting power in 2006 compared to 2002. Tennessee tops the list, having graduated 11.2% more students in 2006 than in 2002. Future briefs will look at progress in the nation’s 50 largest cities, and among the high schools with the lowest graduation rates
Zimmer, R. et. al., (2009) Charter Schools in Eight States Effects on Achievement, Attainment, Integration, and Competition, RAND Corporation.
This study asks four primary research questions about charter schools in eight varied sites. (1) What are the characteristics of students transferring to charter schools? (2) What effect do charter schools have on test-score gains for students who transfer between TPSs and charter schools? (3) What is the effect of attending a charter high school on the probability of graduating and of entering college? (4) What effect does the introduction of charter schools have on test scores of students in nearby TPSs? The authors write, “This study was the first to examine the effects of charter schools on long-term attainment outcomes. In the two locations with attainment data (Florida and Chicago), attending a charter high school is associated with statistically significant and substantial increases in the probability of graduating and of enrolling in college. Among students who attended a charter middle school (for whom we can estimate impacts with greater confidence than for charter–high school students who came from conventional public middle schools), those who went on to attend a charter high school were 7 to 15 percentage points more likely to graduate than students who transitioned to a traditional public high school (controlling for observed student characteristics and test scores). Similarly, those attending a charter high school were 8 to 10 percentage points more likely to enroll in college than were their TPS counterparts.”
Griffin, P. and M. Hunninen, (no date) “Preparing Youth for Productive Futures,” Pennsylvania Progress: A Juvenile Justice Research, Policy and Practice Series National Center for Juvenile Justice.
American Bar Association’s Legal Center for Foster Care and Education
This website has more resources than I can possibly describe here. There are succinct tools especially geared for judges, attorneys, caseworkers and educators; special education fact sheets; and longer reports on many topics including the myths of confidentiality laws to lessons learned from state efforts to promote educational stability for children in foster care. There is a listserv called CHILD-EDUCATION to which anyone can subscribe, and much else. A wonderful resource!
The Center for Social and Emotional Education
CSEE’s goal is to promote positive and sustained school climate: a safe, supportive environment that nurtures social and emotional, ethical, and academic skills. CSEE helps schools integrate crucial social and emotional learning with academic instruction, thereby enhancing student performance, preventing drop outs, reducing physical violence and bullying, and developing healthy and positively engaged adults. You can read online The School Climate Challenge: Narrowing the Gap Between School Climate Research and School Climate Policy, Practice Guidelines and Teacher Education Policy. Or you may purchase the more recent School Climate: Research, Policy, Practice, and Teacher Education published in Teachers College Record in January 2009.
Education Law Center of Pennsylvania (ELC)
The ELC is a non-profit legal center that has worked since 1975 to make good public education a reality for Pennsylvania’s most vulnerable children – poor children, children of color, children with disabilities, English language learners, children in foster homes and institutions, and others. ELC’s work falls into three major areas: 1) Making sure that all children have access to school and school programs. 2) Providing families (and those who work with them) reliable, understandable information about education laws and policies. 3) Improving schools. One of the publications on the ELC website is the Educational Aftercare & Reintegration Toolkit for Juvenile Justice Professionals.
It provides probation officers and others the information they need to advocate effectively for children in, or returning from, out-of-home placements. It is a legal manual based specifically on Pennsylvania law, but several sections refer to Federal laws that would apply in all states. It is an excellent model of what could be done anywhere.
Models for Change: Systems Reform in Juvenile Justice
This initiative is an effort to create successful and replicable models of juvenile justice system reform through targeted investments in four key states: Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana and Washington. The Education Law Center, described above, is the coordinating agency for the Pennsylvania effort. One of its foci is providing more effective services including educational transitions to youth released from detention, called aftercare in juvenile justice language. Action Networks, devoted to accelerating reform in particular issue areas, are operating in 12 additional states. An interactive map illustrates who is doing what. With long-term funding and support from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Models for Change seeks to accelerate progress toward a more rational, fair, effective, and developmentally appropriate juvenile justice system.
21st Century Schools conducts more workshops and conferences on more topics in more locations that I can possibly include in thIS Conference section. Go to their website and pick your next professional development series.
K-12 Conference Website: This is an on-line listing for many types of conferences, with K-12 Education Conferences selected as a sub-category.
Return to the Index of this Issue
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education
Spring K–12 Leadership Institute
Increasing Student Achievement: Using Data to Lead Change
La Jolla, CA
April 17–18, 2009
During this intense, two-day institute, district and school leaders will join leading educational researchers and practitioners to learn how to recognize, evaluate, and implement the best research-proven programs and practices for their schools. They will see how existing schools have successfully used these same interventions to achieve unprecedented student achievement...and how they can duplicate those same results in their own schools. Keynote speaker Robert E. Slavin, Ph.D. is the director of the Center for Research and Reform in Education at Johns Hopkins University and director of the Institute for Effective Education at the University of York, and Mark T. Rolewski is the director of dissemination for leadership research and the national consultant for the Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education (CDDRE) at Johns Hopkins University
How to Evaluate Your Truancy Reduction Program
National Center for School Engagement
Denver, CO
May 28-29
This training is an introduction to program evaluation with a focus on truancy reduction programs. It is designed for those at beginning to intermediate levels, and is not appropriate for those with more sophisticated evaluation needs. During day one, we will introduce different types of evaluations, and the benefits and drawbacks of different methods of data collection. Participants will begin to build logic models of their programs or the programs they are in the process of developing, and will participate in a survey question writing exercise. On Day two, we will introduce the TRAIN database in which truancy reduction program staff can track the progress of their students. Contact Jodi Heilbrunn for registration information.
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools
9th Annual National Charter Schools Conference
June 21-24
Washington DC
Hear Keynote speakers Michelle Rhee, maverick Chancellor of Washington DC Public Schools, and Joel Klein, Chancellor of the NYC Department of Education. Conference registration includes a free pre-conference professional development day for the first 500 classroom teachers who register. Registration is currently open.
American School Counselors Association Annual Conference
Making a Difference
Dallas Convention Center
Dallas, Texas
June 28 – July 1, 2009
This conference will bring together approximately 2,000 pre-kindergarten to post-secondary professional school counselors, counselor educators, supervisors and graduate students. Conference sessions allow attendees to take away solid, practical ideas they can put to work tomorrow, make valuable contacts in the school counseling field and discover the latest techniques in school counseling. Registration is now open, and by registering before March 1 you qualify for the supersaver rate. You still qualify for a smaller discount by registering before May 1. Keynote speakers Louis Gossett Jr., Harry Wong and Frank Warren.
National Association of School Resource Officers
19th Annual SRO-School Safety Conference
June 29 – July 3, 2009
Baltimore, MD
Register by May 23 for a reduced rate.
Keynote speakers address bullying, drug recognition, constitutional law regarding FERPA, IDEA and other issues, and adolescent brain development. Special SRO training classes will be offered during the conference.
Center for Social and Emotional Education
12th Annual Summer Institute entitled
Comprehensive School Climate Reform and Bully Prevention:
Promoting Healthy and Democratic K-12 School Communities
July 7 - 9, 2009
Fordham University
New York City
Register by May 17 for the early bird rate.
This three day institute is designed to support school teams and individuals developing school climate improvement plans to promote safe, caring and civil schools that support positive youth development, democratic school communities, student learning/achievement and “upstander’ behavior (or the inclination and ability to say “no” to bully-victim behavior).
Return to the Index of this Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCSE is an initiative of the
The Partnership for
Families & Children
|
|
www.schoolengagement.org
To unsubscribe to our newsletter please click here
To subscribe to our newsletter please click here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|